While the agency can charge for their services, the woman renting her womb cannot be paid as that will amount to "commercial surrogacy" which has been declared a crime punishable with a maximum of five years imprisonment and a fine upto Rs 10 lakh. Since commercial surrogacy is allowed only in Russia, Ukraine and California, couples desiring to have a child through surrogacy used to flock to Indian shores and approach surrogacy centres located in all major cities in India. Rough estimates state that it is a $2. What we have got instead is the Surrogacy Regulation Bill, 2016. In order to avail of this, the surrogate mother will have to provide a "certification of essentiality" Spray Bottle Manufacturers conditional to insurance coverage.

The question to ask is, at whose cost? The Standing Committee had rejected the altruistic argument of the government and had recommended that compensation should be the norm and the word "altruistic" should be replaced with compensation. As per these ethos, single women or men cannot opt for surrogacy, those who are in stable live-in relationships, lesbians or gay couples are excluded, transgenders are out and anyone who has a child cannot opt for surrogacy, unless the child suffers from a life-threatening disease.As per the Bill, surrogacy can only be undertaken by a close family relative as an altruistic activity, a labour of love, which she must undertake for the love of her childless relative.

There is an age prescription — the mother should be in the age group of 23-50, and the surrogate father in the age group of 26-55.There was ample scope for the surrogate mother’s fundamental rights to be trampled upon by doctors and/or surrogate parents. There is no doubt that it was an exploitative practice and the woman opting to be a surrogate mother was at the receiving end with absolute no rights as there were no regulatory processes in place..After the historic verdict that decriminalised homosexuality and the NALSA judgment which awarded citizenship rights to transgenders, this amounts to discrimination and may attract constitutional challenge.With this Bill a flourishing trade of international surrogacy has come to a grinding halt. An insurance cover is provided for the surrogate mother for a period of 16 months to cover postpartum complications.

They should have been in a stable marriage for five years. The Bill requires all surrogacy clinics to be registered. Only Indians can opt for this procedure, foreigners, and non-residence Indians (NRI) are excluded. They should not have an earlier child of their own and must be declared medically unfit to bear their own children.The Bill now almost seems as though we are moving backwards rather than forward with the times, taking in our stride not scientific advancements and the rights of poor vulnerable rural women, but the patriarchal notion of a woman’s body and womb being the property of the great Indian family.

And now it has cleared a Bill that does not secure their rights, but that throttles their right to a livelihood by renting out their uterus in the name of protecting "Indian family ethos". That is not all. There are also severe restrictions on the couple opting for surrogacy.These women were kept confined in "hostels", they could not meet their family during the pregnancy, there was no insurance against pregnancy-related or postpartum complications

Posted by: goodcosmetic at 02:13 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 561 words, total size 4 kb.